Poster Presentation Australian and New Zealand Society for Geriatric Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting 2026

Dual assessment with 4AT and Clinical Frailty Scale Score at the time of initial assessment predicts mortality more than those individual assessments in older patients (#259)

Harriet Grant 1 , David Carroll 1 2 , Hayley Dargan 1 , Angeline Simons 1
  1. Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia
  2. PA-Southside Clinical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane

Aims:

The aim is to determine if increased frailty and a greater 4AT result on initial emergency department (ED) presentation have additive combined risk for mortality. This is alongside validating frailty assessment and 4AT as independent predictors of mortality.

Methods:

This is a prospective observational study of routinely collected clinical data to include descriptive epidemiology alongside 14-day, 28-day, 6-month and 12-month outcomes of care. Frailty was assessed by Clinical Frailty Scale score (CFS) and delirium was assessed by 4AT. Relative risk of mortality was calculated using 2x2 contingency table. Chi-square testing was used to determine significance.

Results:

473 older patients were assessed in one year. The mean age of patients assessed was 82 years. The median CFS was 6 and the median 4AT value was 1. The mortality rate at 28 days was 6.4%, with all deceased patients at 28 days having a CFS score greater than or equal to 5. The relative risk of mortality was 6.5 times greater in those with a 4AT score greater than or equal to 4.  6-month mortality was 5.5 times higher in those who are frail. Those patients with a CFS score of 5 or greater combined with a 4AT of 5 and above had the highest mortality of all groups, with the association of CFS, 4AT and mortality reaching statistical significance.

Conclusions:

In older patients living with frailty, using both CFS and 4AT together in routine clinical assessment has the potential to predict mortality more accurately than CFS or 4AT in isolation.